Grizzly Bear delisting | Leslie Patten Books: Wild Places, Sacred Spaces

Grizzlies and their Nasty Image: The Journals of Lewis and Clark

Posted on September 17, 2015 by Leslie

It’s fall, and all I can think about are grizzly bears, so here’s another post. I’ve written in previous posts about all the bears I’ve seen this season and about delisting issues. Well, bear sightings continue here in the Upper Clark’s Fork. A few days ago I drove up the dirt road to a drainage called Beem Gulch. In the spring, I saw tracks of a sow with two cubs of the year, though I never saw the bear. I had a feeling she might be around there now, as bears descend into the lower elevations spring and fall looking for food sources. There were about 4 trailers set up in the drainage, though unoccupied. They were wood cutter’s trailers, working on Forest Service slash pile sales.

I walked up a pretty drainage at road’s end, yet saw no bear sign. I was careful of course. Upon driving back down the pot-holed road, I saw her. The car had spooked them, and she was running with her two young cubs across the sagebrush field. Smart mom, she took them into a gully, mid-way, so they were hidden; then used the arroyo as a corridor.

Grizzly track

That sighting, I figured, was the 7th grizzly sighting this season, and if you count the number of bears, then that makes 13 grizzly bears I’ve seen. Normally my tally is zero when hiking or driving around outside of the Park. All these bears were sighted outside of Yellowstone

On the drive home after seeing these bears, I chatted with the game warden. He told me there were three boar grizzlies on a dead horse (horse died naturally) up the road, with one bear lying on top of the horse. The warden’s take on grizzlies mirrors the official stance of Wyoming Game and Fish, as well as the Interagency Grizzly Bear Team–that is, the ecosystem is full, there’s no where for these bears to go, so we need to manage (read hunt) them.

I’ve stated my views in other posts regarding the official view, so I don’t need to restate it here. But I’ve been reading a wonderful book by Paul Schullery called Lewis and Clark Among the Grizzlies. Schullery is a careful historian. He dissects each and every mention and encounter that the Corps had with bears, trying to discern which were black bears and which were grizzlies. He notes that for over 150 years, Lewis & Clark’s journals, along with subsequent articles that sensationalized these encounters, shaped our views of grizzly bears as killers, monsters, Ursus arctos horribilis (note the horribilis that was added). Schullery pauses frequently to ponder how this might have occurred. Wisely, he notes that

The expedition was charged with a lot of tasks, though their main one was to find the route to the Pacific. Observing grizzly bears and their habits was not high on their list.
Every bear the expedition saw, they shot or tried to shoot. This kind of scenario does not make for observing the natural disposition of grizzly bears.
Neither Lewis nor Clark observed the customs Indians had relative to grizzlies, nor did they record any myths. Their only observations were of tribes wearing necklaces of grizzly claws.
Depending on how you break it down, the Corps saw between 37 and 62 grizzly bears on their entire journey. Schullery used the larger number, being very generous in his interpretation. Remember that the Corps were unclear how to note the difference between black and grizzly bears, sometimes referring to grizzlies as ‘white’, ‘brown’, or even ‘variegated’.
Schullery notes that these bears were seen in a very narrow corridor that was traveled, and that the Corps killed only two females. Therefore, most of the bears they saw and killed were males, representing only a tiny portion of the population. Females with cubs were therefore very cautious.

Great Falls 1880

The most damning excerpt from the L&C journals that has helped create the myth of the ferocious blood-thirsty grizzly, was the Corps encounters during their portage at Great Falls. During that long portage of 18 miles whick took weeks, the Corps killed 6 bears and shot at several others. Lewis himself had an encounter that is the most famous, and widely quoted, of all their grizzly stories. Schullery dissects the Great Falls Bear Crisis. There were dead bison in the stream below the falls; it was bear mating season; people had been using the Falls area for thousands of years. Perhaps the bears associated humans with carrion, piles of butchered bison at the bison jump described by Lewis on May 29

Great Falls today. When I visited last June, there was virtually no water in the run-off portion as all was diverted into the new generating station to the right.

Just recently the Cody Enterprise published an opinion piece stating grizzly bears will be a problem and threat to humans until they are hunted and can learn from dying. In order to understand this still-persistent view on grizzly bears, I highly recommend this book. This twisted attitude reflects stories citizens were told through re-interpretations of the journals. Remember, people in the U.S. had never seen nor heard about grizzlies (only black bears lived in the east) till the journals became public. And even today we see how sensationalism, not science, sells!

Scullery ends the book with a beautiful reflection:

Today’s grizzly bears live in a tiny, pathetically restricted fragment of the habitat they occupied when Lewis and Clark met them. When we travel the Lewis and Clark trail we visit a former grizzly bear kingdom now lost under cities, ranches, and the very civilized landscapes that the captains and their president could only dream of…We stand along the Missouri River and where there are now dams and roads and cities we feel a vague longing to see what Lewis and Clark saw. Sometimes we can still see much of what they saw, and we strain to imagine the rest.

Grizzly bears are gone from almost every mlle of the routes traveled by Lewis and Clark. The bears survive only in isolated enclaves—a few mountain sanctuaries–places that at best the captains may have viewed from a hazy distance. The bears were gone long before we were born, but in some achingly vague, intergenerational way, we seem to recall them, and even miss them. In their absence these bears have become even more powerful symbols of the landscape than they were when they still roamed it so confidently. They are symbols not only of something lost, but of something we might decide to have again. Perhaps some day, we wonder, it might be possible to travel at least a few stretches of this immense, generous river and again have the chance Lewis and Clark had–to encounter this terrible, beautiful, unforgettable animal. What a discovery that would be.

Grizzly sow with cubs. Yellowstone

Filed under: Bears | Tagged: grizzlies, Grizzly Bear delisting, Grizzly bears, Lewis and Clark, Paul Schullery | Leave a comment »

Spring, Grizzly tracking, and What’s up with Delisting

Posted on May 23, 2015 by Leslie

It’s spring and that means the bears are out. But so is everyone else. Pups are born and need to be feed; elk are calving; birds are nesting. It’s a busy time and a great time to go into the Park. There you can also see the bison babies.

But here in my valley right next to Yellowstone, all the same activity is taking place, just a tad more hidden.

Coyote relaxing before she goes mousing again

Young bull moose

Sandhill Crane

Ruddy Duck with Horned Grebes

I live in a ‘drop off’ place for bears that get into trouble. Bear trouble around here always means trouble that people make for bears like not putting up their food stuff correctly, or not watching their stock so calves or lambs are killed. The Interagency Bear Management Team drops bears off here hoping they will go into the Park. Usually they ‘home’ back to where they came from; but because the Agency has been moving them around for so long, all the drainages around here are already occupied by other bears.

The spring is when bears hang around down low as they follow the seasonal warm-up. They spend time eating grass, or, if they can find it, winter kills, and dig for roots. Hiking at this time of year here in the valley it’s inevitable that you will see grizzly tracks and it’s worth knowing what they look like and how to identify them. For instance, the other day I hiked a drainage and saw what appeared to be a single boar grizzly roaming that area. Another drainage nearby revealed a sow and a two year old–a combination I definitely needed to be watchful of. It seems like every hike either you are ‘following’ a bear or maybe the bear is ‘following’ you. Yet keep in mind that grizzly and black bears are mindful of their own business and are not looking for an encounter with a human. The best advice is to be alert, awake, aware. Carry bear spray and know how to use it quickly. Take your time in the woods–no power walking or headphones. Stop every so often and look around like a deer might.

Bear tracks are easy to identify–they look a lot like human footprints, but bears have their big toe opposite than humans and walk pigeon-toed. Telling the difference between a grizzly and a black bear takes more practice and is not always a certain thing. The Palmisciano method is the recommended technique, working only on front tracks.

Jim Halfpenny says if you have a good, clean track, it is very accurate. But he also notes that ‘anyone who says it is always easy has not done much tracking’.

Since I.D.ing that the print is a bear is easy, what takes practice and is much more pertinent is being able to pick out a track when it’s very faint. With practice, I find that bear prints are so distinguishable that they are probably the easiest to pick out even when hard to see. Here are a few examples.

Print looks even larger because its in mud, but you can see his claws

This one is easy of course. The next one isn’t so hard but you could miss it in the puddle.

Bear print in a puddle

The puddle print is a perfect example of how difficult the Palmisciano method can be, especially with just one print. The above print appears to be a black bear, but since I was following this bear for about a mile on a dirt track, I had other prints that were much more distinct. I also know the area is frequented by grizzlies and not blacks. So the above print, although it appears like a black bear print, is actually the front print of a grizzly.

Below prints are pretty easy too. Note the back foot is in front of the smaller front foot. That’s a typical gait for a bear called an amble.

Can you see these two bear prints, front and back?

Now look at this one. Koda has stepped on part of it and mostly the metatarsal pad is what is strong. If you look to the top of the photo you can barely make out his left front foot.

One saying trackers have is that it’s not the track you can see, but the next track that you cannot see that teaches you how to track. Keeping that in mind, follow a bear’s footprints and measure or use a stick to see the distance between right and left tracks. Soon you will come upon a track that is not visible, but with the stick as a measure you will know where it is. Study that ‘print’ and soon it jump out at you. After a while of doing this, you’ll find yourself walking along and then ‘see’ a print that seems invisible to others. Seeing that print might just keep you safe as it will heighten your awareness and let you know there’s a grizzly in town.

Koda shows the size of this bear scat

Grizzlies are ‘on the chopping block’ to be delisted. The IGBT and Sally Jewell are itching to return their management to the states. Once that happens, they will be hunted.

I disagree with delisting for a wide variety of reasons. In the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) which is basically the area around Glacier National Park, there are approximately 750 grizzly bears. In the Greater Yellowstone Area (GYE) there are about the same. But the connecting corridors in-between have few to no bears.

NCDE bears can connect for genetic diversity up into Canada. But how can our bears here, in the GYE, connect? Studies have shown that without any infusion of new genes, these GYE bears will eventually die out.

When grizzlies were listed back in 1975, there were about 120 bears in the GYE. It has taken over 40 years to get to this point where we have over 700 bears. If hunting begins, the ‘easy’ bears, at the edges of the Ecosystem, will be killed. Those are the bears that would connect north with their cousins.

And more importantly, living with bears and seeing how intelligent they are, I cannot see how we can hunt them. Like the tribes who are united against delisting, I have come to feel a powerful spirit connection with grizzlies.

Please read my op-ed below that appeared in the Powell Tribune a few weeks ago. I tell the story of ‘The Woman Who Married a Bear’ and how we are like that woman today.

Patten Guest Column_5.5.15

Filed under: Grizzlies | Tagged: Grizzly Bear delisting, Grizzly bear tracks, Grizzly bears, Interagency Bear Management Team, Yellowstone National Park | 2 Comments »